The Importance of Inclusive Language in Neurodiversity
Language shapes how we think about and discuss neurodiversity. It influences attitudes, perceptions, and ultimately the inclusion—or exclusion—of neurodivergent individuals in everyday life. The words we choose matter: they reflect our values and the level of respect we extend to the people we are talking about.
Using thoughtful, empowering language helps us foster understanding, reduce stigma, and support a more inclusive society.
Identity-First Language
Many people within the neurodivergent community prefer identity-first language, which places the identity before the person—for example, “autistic person” rather than “person with autism”.
This approach recognises neurodivergence as an integral part of who someone is, rather than something separate or negative. For many, identity-first language is empowering, allowing them to reclaim and affirm their neurodivergent identity with pride.
Examples:
- Autistic person → instead of person with autism
- Dyslexic person → instead of person with dyslexia
- ADHD person → instead of person with ADHD
At Together for Neurodiversity, we use identity-first language wherever appropriate, honouring and respecting neurodivergent identities.
Person-First Language
Person-first language (e.g., “person with autism”) is still used in some settings, particularly within certain medical or educational frameworks. Its intention is to emphasise the person before the diagnosis.
However, many neurodivergent people feel this phrasing implies that their neurodivergence is something separate from them—or something undesirable.
Preferences vary, and the most respectful approach is always to ask individuals how they would like to be identified.
Avoiding Harmful Terminology
Historically, language describing neurodiversity has often been deficit-based, using terms rooted in the medical model. Words like “suffers from”, “afflicted by”, or “impaired” reinforce stigma and negative stereotypes.
Neurodivergent people do not suffer from their identity—they experience the world differently.
Language to Avoid | Language to Use Instead |
|---|---|
Choosing balanced, respectful language helps challenge misconceptions and promotes a more accurate understanding of neurodiversity.
Outdated Language and Why It Shouldn’t Be Used
Our understanding of neurodiversity has evolved, and so has the language we use. Some terms, once common, are now outdated or incorrect. A key example is Asperger’s Syndrome.
Asperger’s is no longer used in modern diagnostic frameworks such as the DSM-5, where it has been absorbed into the broader umbrella of Autism Spectrum Disorder. This reflects the recognition that autism is a spectrum rather than a set of distinct categories.
Additionally, the term has problematic historical associations. Hans Asperger has been linked to the Nazi regime and eugenics movement, causing further discomfort with the continued use of the term.
For these reasons, Together for Neurodiversity avoids outdated terminology and uses language that is current, respectful, and inclusive.
Respecting Individual Preferences
Language is deeply personal. Not all neurodivergent people share the same preferences, and that’s okay. The most inclusive approach is simple:
ASK, LISTEN, and RESPECT how each person chooses to identify.
This is especially important in professional settings, support environments, and when working with families.
Moving Towards Inclusive, Empowering Language
Language has the power to shift perceptions and create change. By choosing inclusive, accurate, and affirming terminology, we can support a society that understands, values, and celebrates neurodivergent individuals.
In summary:
Identity-first language is widely preferred in many neurodivergent communities.
Deficit-based terminology should be avoided.
Strengths should be celebrated, not overshadowed by challenges.
Respecting individual identity preferences is essential.
By being intentional with our language, we help build a world where neurodivergent people feel seen, respected, and empowered.